Driade
Contents
| Cable | Driade Flow 405 and Driade Flow 808 Reference |
| Balance low, mid and high | 405: nice midrange. Treble a bit rounded and bass is tad messy.
808: very good balance. Treble is tad rounded. Rich mid bass. |
| Tone of vocals and instruments | 405: No aggression at all. Tabla is nice. Fine sustain on the piano. Voices are nice, but lose some depth because of the rounded treble.
808: Nice harmony vocals and woodwork sounds good. |
| Stereo image | 405: Fine 3D stereo image. Good in proportion.
808: Well delineated, but not very large…. yet doesn’t feel bounded. |
| Rhythm | 405: Flow… cable very much deserves its name! 808: Again good flow and fine emphasis on the melody line. Reverb well audible. Ambiance a little less so. |
| Overall | 405: A lot of flow and warmth. Especially in the midrange. Bass is not under control. Nice and romantic. That is.
808: again a loads of flow. No aggressiveness. |
| Material and construction | 405: stranded copper (405 wires). In three bundles of 135 threads.
808: stranded copper (800 threads). In eight bundles of 100 wires. |
| Price | 405: 800 Euro, 808: 1600 Euro |
Measurements Driade 405 and 808
LCR Measurements
Propagation Variation
Driade 405
Driade 808
Response measurements
Driade 405
Driade 808
Noise measurements
Driade 405

Driade 808

























Hi team,
This is quite an amazing project that you have done.
I am trying to use this information to help my selection decision making on some new cables. My conclusion is that the Audiomica ones which you tested seem to be the best value in terms of price vs your feedback about their sound. And from the qualitative feedback it seems like those cables would play well with most systems. Is this a correct conclusion to draw from the testing?
I understand that I would probably want to try the cables out on my system to make sure that they fit with the sound that I like.
I am relatively new to hi-fi so I apologise if this is a question that is a philosophically wrong way to think about things.
I wonder, if the impedance of the cables would not provide a more significant perspective instead of individual values of R, C and L ?
Hey Jaap, that is a really nice test with lots of information, thanks for that! Would it be possible to have it all into one table for a good overview, instead having to scroll through the individual pages? May be too much to ask 🙂
Keep up the awesome work!
Standard cable of 2.5mm2… I am using 16mm2 “standard wire”, 3m long. Very low resistance. That ticks one box. I guess I can theoretically calculate the inductance and capacitance. Wonder if these are of significant consequence at 20kHz. Maybe I can twist the cable to reduce the inductance if it has some impact.
This is beyond – need to study it – not just read, to understand.
Thanks for including the “peasant” installation cable AudioQuest 14/4 – I use the more expensive version XTRM 14/4. My question is – how did you terminate the cable and in what configuration? I have it terminated with nakamichi bananas and connected in a star-quad configuration.
Martin
And, just like that, Alpha-Audio shoots to the top of the audio reviewer heap! The GOAT of tests and shoot-outs. Well done kind sirs, that was an impressive and Herculean effort!
Thanks,
Eric